Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind Opposes Same-Sex Marriage in Supreme Court, Cites Religious and Social Concerns
In a significant development, the Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind on April 1 filed an intervening application in the Supreme Court of India in the ongoing hearings related to the legal recognition of same-sex marriages.
The prominent Islamic organization voiced its strong opposition to same-sex unions, arguing that such recognition would disrupt the traditional family structure and conflict with religious beliefs.
🔹 Key Points from the Application
In its submission to the apex court, Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind emphasized that:
-
Marriage, under Islamic law, is a sacred contract between a biological man and a biological woman, and any deviation from this definition is not only religiously impermissible but also socially destabilizing.
-
Same-sex marriage, the organization stated, poses a serious threat to the established institution of family and could lead to widespread cultural and moral disintegration.
-
The group further argued that attempts to redefine marriage in a way that includes same-sex couples would be contrary to the fundamental religious and cultural values upheld by millions of Indians.
🔹 Why It Matters
The Supreme Court is currently hearing multiple petitions seeking legal recognition of same-sex marriages under various laws, including the Special Marriage Act. The outcome of these hearings could reshape India’s marriage laws and have far-reaching implications for LGBTQ+ rights and religious freedoms.
🔹 Broader Context
Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind’s intervention adds to the growing list of religious and social organizations expressing concern over the redefinition of marriage. Their stand reflects the complex intersection of law, religion, and evolving social norms in the country.
As the debate continues in court, the matter remains one of the most closely watched legal battles in recent times, raising fundamental questions about equality, tradition, and the role of the judiciary in shaping social policy.
